Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Rugby Union Ltd v Hospitality Group Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1136 INTERLOCUTORY PROCEEDINGS – applications for interlocutory injunctions – applicant sold tickets to certain rugby union test matches subject to condition that tickets cannot be resold at a premium or used for commercial purposes – applicant also entered agreement appointing third respondent as one of its licensed retail travel agents, entitling third respondent to some tickets to the matches – agency agreement only allowed agent to sell tickets as part of "travel packages" – first and second respondents bought tickets from third respondent – first and second respondents sold tickets to public as part of "hospitality packages" - whether serious issues to be tried in relation to breach of contract, inducing breach of contract, or breach of Part IV of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – balance of convenience TRADE PRACTICES – whether applicant, by supplying tickets subject to condition and by restricting scope of agents' activities, breached Part IV of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) CONTRACT – restraint of trade – whether condition on tickets and restrictive clause in agency contract are void as being restraints of trade – whether void for uncertainty or as being a penalty INJUNCTIONS – mandatory interlocutory injunction – whether applicant should be ordered to deliver tickets to third respondent in accordance with agency agreement UNDERTAKINGS – applicant's prior undertaking not to use information in certain documents for purposes other than the conduct of the proceedings – documents admitted into evidence – whether applicant should be released from undertaking
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 4F, 4L, 4M, 45(2), 46(1), 47, 87(2) Restraints of Trade Act 1976 (NSW), s 4(1) Federal Court Rules, O 15, r 18 Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280, distinguished Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Plowman (1995) 183 CLR 10, cited Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia (1986) 161 CLR 148, cited Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia [No 3] (1998) 72 ALJR 873, cited Bullock v The Federated Furnishing Trades Society of Australasia (No 1) (1985) 5 FCR 464, cited Businessworld Computers Pty Ltd v Australian Telecommunications Commission (1988) 82 ALR 499, cited Carson v Minister for Education (Queensland) (1989) 25 FCR 326, cited Michael v State Housing Commission (1996) 68 FCR 105, cited Kolback Securities Ltd v Epoch Mining NL (1987) 8 NSWLR 533, cited National Mutual Holdings Pty Ltd v Sentry Corporation (1989) 22 FCR 209, cited Russell v Russell (1976) 134 CLR 495, followed Chapmans Ltd v Australian Stock Exchange (unreported, Tamberlin J, 25 August 1995), cited Eltran Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1990) 25 FCR 322, cited Woolworths Ltd v Campbells Cash and Carry Pty Ltd (1996) 92 LGERA 244, cited Greater London Council v Connolly [1970] 2 QB 100, cited Trade Practices Commission v Tooth & Co Ltd (1979) 142 CLR 397, cited Beneficial Finance Corporation Ltd v Sharker (1993) 32 NSWLR 161, cited Shevill v Builders Licensing Board (1982) 149 CLR 620, cited Victoria v Australian Building Construction Employees' and Builders Labourers' Federation (1982) 152 CLR 25, cited Teheran-Europe Co Ltd v ST Belton (Tractors) Ltd [1968] 2 QB 545, cited Buckley v Tutty (1971) 125 CLR 353, cited Amoco Australia Pty Ltd v Rocca Bros Motor Engineering Co Pty Ltd (1973) 133 CLR 288, cited Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Harper's Garage (Stourport) Ltd [1968] AC 269, cited News Ltd v Australian Rugby Football League Ltd (1996) 64 FCR 410, cited ASX Operations Pty Ltd v Pont Data Australia Pty Ltd (No 1) (1990) 27 FCR 460, cited Queensland Wire Industries Pty Ltd v Broken Hill Proprietary Co Ltd (1989) 167 CLR 177, cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate