Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Eunson v Beaulieu United Ltd [1999] FCA 1164 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Pleadings – whether statement of claim should be struck out – whether deed of arrangement prevented the applicant from bringing claims – whether actions statute-barred – whether the limitation question should be determined at an interlocutory stage – allegation of fraud – whether fraud pleaded with sufficient particularity.
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Part X Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 52 and s 82(2) Federal Court Rules O 12 r 2 and r 3 Limitation of Actions Act 1958 (Vic) s 5 In re Rhagg (Deceased) [1938] Ch 828 cited Reference under the Electricity Commission (Balmain Electric Light Co. Purchase) Act 1950 [1957] SR (NSW) 100 cited Top of the Cross Pty Ltd & Anor v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1980) 50 FLR 19; affirmed (1981) 57 FLR 294 referred Whittaker v Delmina Pty Ltd (unreported, Supreme Court of Victoria, Hansen J, 18 December 1998) [1998] VSC 175 cited Gardner v London Chatham & Dover Railway Co (No 1) (1867) LR 2 Ch App 201 referred Page v International Trust Agency & Industrial Trust Ltd (1893) 62 LJCh 610 cited Codelfa Construction Proprietary Limited v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1982) 149 CLR 337 followed Akai Pty Limited v The People's Insurance Company Limited (1996) 188 CLR 418 cited Wardley Australia Limited & Anor v The State of Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 followed Karedis Enterprises Pty Ltd & Anor v Antoniou & Anor (1995) 59 FCR 35 cited Banque Commerciale SA, En liquidation v Akhil Holdings Limited (1990) 169 CLR 279 cited Allstate Life Insurance Co & Ors v Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd & Ors (1995) 57 FCR 360 cited Baltic Shipping Company v Dillon (1993) 176 CLR 344 followed Zoneff & Anor v Elcom Credit Union Limited (1990) ATPR 41-009; affirmed (1990) ATPR 41-058 cited Argy & Anor v Blunts & Lane Cove Real Estate Pty Ltd & Ors (1990) 26 FCR 112 cited Steiner & Anor v Magic Carpet Tours Pty Ltd & Ors (1984) ATPR 40-490 cited Brickhill & Anor v Cooke & Anor [1984] 3 NSWLR 396 cited Re Dowling; Ex parte Jamison; Jamison v Allen (1979) 36 FLR 384 cited Re Armessen; Ex parte South Coast Timber Industries Pty Limited (1963) 19 ABC 190 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate