Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tyco Australia Pty Ltd v Tabart [1999] FCA 1220
TYCO AUSTRALIA PTY LTD v GAVIN TABART & ORS V 254 of 1999 GOLDBERG J MELBOURNE 18 AUGUST 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 254 of 1999
BETWEEN: TYCO AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
Applicant
AND: GAVIN TABART
Respondent
JOHN SPANGARO
Second Respondent
FIRE SYSTEMS MONITORING PTY LTD
Third Respondent
JUDGE: GOLDBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 18 AUGUST 1999
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. In this order the expression "Confidential Documents" shall mean: (1) All documents, all computer disks, records, files or extracts therefrom, all storage devices, all photographs taken and all copies of the contents of computer disks and storage devices made by or on the instructions of the Applicant's solicitors pursuant to the orders of this Court made on 19 May and 25 May 1999. (2) All exhibits marked "Special Confidential" referred to in affidavits filed in this proceeding by any party. 2. Each of the Confidential Documents (save for the exhibits referred to in par 4 hereof) and all information derived from them shall be kept confidential and: (a) shall only be disclosed to: (i) counsel and solicitors for the parties; (ii) the respondents only in the presence of counsel or a solicitor for any of the respondents in this proceeding; (iii) the applicant only in the presence of counsel or a solicitor for the applicant in this proceeding; and (iv) any independent expert nominated by any of the parties under par 3 of this order, each of whom shall be bound by this order, and shall not be open to public inspection whilst filed or used in this proceeding; and (b) shall be used only for the purposes of this proceeding. 3. None of the Confidential Documents or information derived therefrom shall be disclosed to or inspected by any independent expert nominated by any party unless that party at least three days earlier supplied the other parties with (a) the name, qualifications and affiliations of the independent expert; and (b) a copy of an undertaking duly executed by the independent expert in the form of the Undertaking set out in the Schedule hereto,
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate