Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singh v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1234 MIGRATION - whether the Tribunal failed to comply with procedure to be observed in connection with the making of the decision required by the Act contrary to s 476(1)(a) of the Act - whether s 430 prescribes procedures required to be observed in connection with the making of a decision under the Act – whether s 430 complied with. MIGRATION - application for protection visa - application for review - potential violence in the Punjab region. MIGRATION - whether Refugee Review Tribunal failed to comply with procedure required by the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - whether the Tribunal failed to give the applicant an opportunity to appear before it to give evidence under s 425(1) of the Act. MIGRATION - whether Tribunal failed to consider evidentiary material received - whether the Tribunal failed its obligation to review the decision of the delegate under s 414. Migration Act 1958 (Cth)ss 36, 414(1), 418, 420(2), 423, 425(1)(a), 425(1)(b), 430, 476(1)(a) and 476(3)(e) Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 43(2B) Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21 considered Steed v Minister for Immigration and Ethic Affairs (1981) ALR 620 considered Ahmed v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 811 considered Muralidharan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1996) 62 FCR 602 considered Ozberk v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 700 considered Paramananthan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 160 ALR 24 considered Han v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 376 considered Voitenko v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (Federal Court, Moore J, unreported, 27 August 1998) considered Kandiah v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (Federal Court, Finn J, unreported, 3 September 1998) followed Abebe v The Commonwealth (1999) 162 ALR 1 considered Dornan v Riordan (1990) 24 FCR 564 applied Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 applied
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate