Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Foster v Northern Territory of Australia [1999] FCA 1235
ABORIGINAL LANDS – traditional land claims – conservation land reserve – vested in Conservation Land Corporation – whether alienated Crown land – whether corporation a person other than the Crown – vesting of land in corporation – whether estate or interest held by corporation – application to Aboriginal Land Commissioner – jurisdiction of Commissioner – stare decisis – prior decision of High Court on same land and same issue – arguments not agitated before High Court – ratio of High Court decision binding on Federal Court – application for judicial review dismissed. COURTS AND JUDGES – precedent – binding effect of relevant decision by High Court – High Court decision based on challenged assumption – assumption essential step in reasoning – conclusion binding on lower courts – limits of per incuriam rule. Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 (Cth), ss 3, 50(1)(a) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B
R v Kearney; Ex parte Japanangka (1984) 158 CLR 395, followed R v Kearney; Ex parte Northern Land Council (1984) 158 CLR 365, cited Attorney-General for Quebec v Attorney-General For Canada [1921] 1 AC 401, cited City of Perth v Crystal Park Ltd (1940) 64 CLR 153, cited Sydney Harbour Trust Commissioners v Wailes (1908) 5 CLR 879, cited Jacob v Utah Construction and Engineering Pty Ltd (1966) 116 CLR 200, followed Garcia v National Australia Bank Ltd (1998) 155 ALR 614, followed Archer v Howell (1992) 7 WAR 33, cited Ex parte Callinan; Re Russell (1945) 45 SR(NSW) 358, cited Proctor v Jetway Aviation Pty Ltd [1984] 1 NSWLR 166, followed Cassell & Co Ltd v Broome [1972] AC 1027, cited Schweppes Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia (1944) 45 SR(NSW) 35, cited
Stone, Precedent and Law (1985) Cross and Harris, Precedent in English Law (4th ed 1991) LESLEY FOSTER AND OTHERS v NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA, CONSERVATION LAND CORPORATION, THE HON JUSTICE H W OLNEY, Acting as the ABORIGINAL LAND COMMISSIONER DG 15 OF 1998 FRENCH, TAMBERLIN AND SACKVILLE JJ 31 AUGUST 1999 (Date of Judgment) 17 SEPTEMBER 1999 (Date Reasons Published) DARWIN
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate