Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Shiel v Secretary, Department of Social Security [1999] FCA 1237 SOCIAL SECURITY - application for retrospective rent assistance - whether Secretary to pay rent assistance only when satisfied that rate of newstart allowance paid is currently less than rate provided by Social Security Act - whether Secretary's duty in administering Act to have regard to desirability of achieving certain results imports duty to obtain information about change in person's circumstances - whether Secretary's power to obtain information relevant to question of applicable rate of social security payment must be exercised - whether part of function of Administrative Appeals Tribunal to determine whether Secretary breached duty imposed by Act. Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 33(2A) Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 19(2) Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) Pt 2.12, Divs 5, 5A, ss 635, 640, 641, 642, 643, 660(2), 660G, 660K, 1068, 1296(a)(i), 1296(a)(iii), 1304(1), 1304(2), 1304(3), 1304(4), 1304(7) Tefonu Pty Ltd v Insurance and Superannuation Commissioner (1993) 44 FCR 361, cited Yarmirr v Australian Telecommunications Corporation (1990) 96 ALR 739, followed Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Redmore Pty Ltd (1989) 166 CLR 454, followed Ward v Williams (1955) 92 CLR 496, followed Julius v Bishop of Oxford (1880) 5 App Cas 214, followed Commissioner for Superannuation v Hastings (1986) 70 ALR 625, cited Green v Daniels (1977) 13 ALR 1, cited CHRISTOPHER SHIEL v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY NG 1239 of 1998 KATZ J SYDNEY 13 SEPTEMBER 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 1239 of 1998
On appeal from a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal constituted by Ms S Bullock, Member
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate