Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Abdi v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1253 MIGRATION – application to review decision of Refugee Review Tribunal – whether procedures required by the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether decision involved error of law involving an incorrect interpretation of applicable law or incorrect application of law to facts as found – whether Minister had jurisdiction to reject application for protection visa based on satisfaction or non-satisfaction as to refugee status Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 430, 476(1)(a), 476(1)(e), 476(2) Randhawa v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 124 ALR 265, cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Prathapan (1998) 156 ALR 672, cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 162 ALR 577, cited Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 17 CLR 321, cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Epeabaka (1999) 84 FCR 411, cited
YONIS HUSSEIN ABDI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 419 of 1999 O'CONNOR J SYDNEY 10 SEPTEMBER 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 419 of 1999
BETWEEN: YONIS HUSSEIN ABDI
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: O'CONNOR J
DATE OF ORDER: 10 SEPTEMBER 1999
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: The application be dismissed with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 419 OF 1999
BETWEEN: YONIS HUSSEIN ABDI
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate