Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kalansooriya v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999]
FCA 1258 MIGRATION – application for review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal refusing protection visa – applicant's failure to appear – application determined ex parte Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 36(2), 65(1), 420(2)(b), 425(1), 430(1)(c), 476(1) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), reg 866.221
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 162 ALR 577, cited
DARSHANA PUBUDU KALANSOORIYA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 554 OF 1999 JUDGE: SACKVILLE J PLACE: SYDNEY DATE: 10 SEPTEMBER 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 554 OF 1999
BETWEEN: DARSHANA PUBUDU KALANSOORIYA
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: SACKVILLE J
DATE OF ORDER: 10 SEPTEMBER 1999
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the proceedings.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 554 OF 1999
BETWEEN: DARSHANA PUBUDU KALANSOORIYA
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: SACKVILLE J
DATE: 10 SEPTEMBER 1999
PLACE: SYDNEY
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The Application 1 This is an application, pursuant to s 476(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ("Migration Act"), to review a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal ("RRT") made on 13 May 1999. The RRT affirmed a decision made by a delegate of the Minister on 7 July 1997, refusing to grant the applicant a protection visa.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate