Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Commissioner of Taxation v Pine Creek Goldfields Ltd [1999] FCA 1267
INCOME TAX – taxpayer engaged in goldmining operations in the Northern Territory – covenant in the mineral lease prevented the taxpayer from mining on, or obstructing, any road on the leased land unless the taxpayer had constructed an alternative road over a route to a standard acceptable to the Minister - taxpayer incurred expenditure on the design, corridor acquisition and construction costs of a diversion of the Stuart Highway which ran adjacent to the open-cut mining pit on the leased land – relocation of the highway enabled the taxpayer to access mineral reserves otherwise inaccessible – whether taxpayer was entitled to deduct the expenditure under s 51(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ("the Act") – whether the expenditure was of a capital nature – whether taxpayer was entitled to deduct the expenditure under Division 10 of Part III of the Act – whether expenditure was "allowable capital expenditure" as defined in s 122A of the Act Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ss 51(1), 122(1), 122A(1)(a), 122DG Inland Revenue Commissioners v British Salmson Aero Engines Ltd [1938] 2 KB 482, cited Hallstroms Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1946) 72 CLR 634, cited GP International Pipecoaters Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1990) 170 CLR 124, applied BP Australia Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1965) 112 CLR 386, applied Sun Newspapers Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1938) 61 CLR 337, applied BP Australia Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) [1966] AC 224, cited Alianza Co Ltd v Bell [1906] AC 18, cited Nizich v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1991) 91 ATC 4,747, cited Kauri Timber Co Ltd v Commissioner of Taxes (NZ) [1913] AC 771, cited Golden Horse Shoe (New) Ltd v Thurgood [1934] 1 KB 548, cited Knight v Calder Grove Estates (1954) 35 TC 447, cited Stow Bardolph Gravel Co Ltd v Poole [1954] 3 All ER 637, cited HJ Rorke Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners (1960) 39 TC 194, cited British Insulated & Helsby Cables Ltd v Atherton [1926] AC 205, referred to Strick v Regent Oil Co Ltd [1966] AC 295, considered Cliffs International Inc v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1979) 142 CLR 140, considered Herring v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1946) 72 CLR 543, considered Denison Mines Ltd v Minister of National Revenue (1974) 49 DLR (3rd) 450, considered Commissioner of Taxation v Mount Isa Mines Ltd (1991) 28 FCR 269, discussed Re Addie & Sons (1875) 2 SC 431, cited Coltness Iron Co v Black (1881) 6 App Cas 315, cited Mallett v Staveley Coal & Iron Co Ltd [1928] 2 KB 405, considered Mount Isa Mines Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1992) 176 CLR 141, discussed Robert Addie & Sons' Collieries Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1924] SC 231, considered United Collieries Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1930] SC 215, considered Bean v Doncaster Amalgamated Collieries Ltd (1944) 171 LT 214, considered Doncaster Amalgamated Collieries Ltd v Bean [1946] 1 All ER 642, cited Utah Development Co v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1975) 5 ALR 474, considered Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) v Utah Development Co (1976) 9 ALR 660, referred to Cyprus Mines Corporation v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1978) 22 ALR 322, considered Johns-Manville Canada Inc v The Queen (1985) 21 DLR (4th) 210, distinguished Tucker v Granada Motorway Services Ltd [1979] 1 WLR 683, applied Robe River Mining Co Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1989) 21 FCR 1, cited Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) v Broken Hill Pty Co Ltd (1969) 120 CLR 240, applied QCT Resources Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1997) 97 ATC 4,432, cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate