FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Worrell v Tantner-Issitch [1999] FCA 1297 SIGFRIED TANTNER EX PARTE: IVOR WORRELL v LUDMILLA ISSITCH aka LUDMILLA TANTNER-ISSITCH DOWSETT J 14 SEPTEMBER 1999 BRISBANE IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY QG 7007 OF 1996 BETWEEN: SIGFRIED TANTNER Bankrupt EX PARTE: IVOR WORRELL Applicant AND: LUDMILLA ISSITCH aka LUDMILLA TANTNER-ISSITCH Respondent JUDGE: DOWSETT J DATE OF ORDER: 14 SEPTEMBER 1999 WHERE MADE: BRISBANE THE COURT ORDERS THAT: Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY QG 7007 OF 1996 BETWEEN: SIGFRIED TANTNER Bankrupt EX PARTE: IVOR WORRELL Applicant AND: LUDMILLA ISSITCH aka LUDMILLA TANTNER-ISSITCH Respondent JUDGE: DOWSETT J DATE: 14 SEPTEMBER 1999 PLACE: BRISBANE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 I would not normally entertain an application for interrogatories at this late stage, but these are proceedings in bankruptcy, and it does seem to me that they have been conducted in a quite singular way on both sides. I am of the view that the conduct of the trial is likely to be very much expedited if the interrogatories are answered. In those circumstances I think that it is probably in the interests of the administration of justice that they be answered. I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Dowsett. Associate: Dated: 15 September 1999 Counsel for the Applicant: Mr M Martin Solicitor for the Applicant: Baker Johnson Counsel for the Respondent: Mr P McQuade Solicitor for the Respondent: Andrew P Abaza Date of Hearing: 14 September 1999 Date of Judgment: 14 September 1999