Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Howard Smith Industries Pty Ltd v Richards [1999] FCA 1310 Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth): s 6 HOWARD SMITH INDUSTRIES PTY LTD v JAMES PAUL RICHARDS VG 62 of 1998 GOLDBERG J MELBOURNE 10 SEPTEMBER 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY No VG 62 of 1998
BETWEEN: HOWARD SMITH INDUSTRIES PTY LTD
(ACN 004 082 062)
Applicant
AND: JAMES PAUL RICHARDS
Respondent
JUDGE: GOLDBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 10 SEPTEMBER 1999
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal is allowed. 2. The decision of the Tribunal dated 2 February 1998 is set aside and the matter is remitted to the Tribunal differently constituted to determine the compensation (if any) to be paid by the applicant to the respondent in respect of that amount of the respondent's hearing loss and impairment and tinnitus, which occurred on and after 24 June 1993. 3. The respondent pay the applicant's costs of the appeal, including reserved costs. 4. A certificate be granted pursuant to s 6 of the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth) to the respondent stating that in the opinion of the Court it is appropriate for the Attorney‑General to authorise a payment under the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth) to the respondent in respect of: (a) the costs incurred by the respondent in relation to this appeal; (b) any costs incurred by the appellant in respect of the appeal that are required to be paid by the respondent to the appellant in pursuance of this order.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY No VG 62 of 1998
BETWEEN: HOWARD SMITH INDUSTRIES PTY LTD
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate