Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Trustees of the Post Office Staff Superannuation Scheme
v Commissioner of Taxation [1999] FCA 1347
TAXATION – deductions for complying superannuation funds that self insure for death and disability benefits – application for extension of time to obtain actuarial certificates and thereby claim deductions – whether quantum of deduction and potential to amend legislation were irrelevant matters to take into account. Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 ss 267, 279, 301
Lighthouse Philatelics Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1991) 91 ATC 4942 cited Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344cited Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 followed A'hearn v Comcare (1993) 18 AAR 22 cited Zizza v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 99 ATC 4,711 cited
THE TRUSTEES OF THE POST OFFICE STAFF SUPERANNUATION
SCHEME AND THE TRUSTEES OF THE BT PENSION SCHEME v
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION NG 1127 of 1998 HILL J 29 SEPTEMBER 1999 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 1127 OF 1998
BETWEEN: THE TRUSTEES OF THE POST OFFICE STAFF SUPERANNUATION SCHEME
First Applicant
THE TRUSTEES OF THE BT PENSION SCHEME
Second Applicant
AND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Respondent
JUDGE: HILL J
DATE OF ORDER: 29 SEPTEMBER 1999
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The decisions under review be set aside and remitted to the Commissioner for determination in accordance with the law. 2. The respondent pay the applicant's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 1127 OF 1999
BETWEEN: THE TRUSTEES OF THE POST OFFICE STAFF SUPERANNUATION SCHEME
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate