Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Naheem v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1360 IMMIGRATION – Refugees – Refugee Review Tribunal – Application for review of decision refusing protection visa – Application for review to be lodged within prescribed period – Prescribed period a number of days after notification of Minister's decision – Legislation deeming notification to have been received seven days after date of document – Whether Tribunal erred in applying deeming provision and thus treating application as lodged out of time – Name on envelope containing notification not applicant's full name – Whether notification sent "to the applicant" if full name not used – Tribunal assumed letter directed to applicant – Whether no evidence to support Tribunal's decision – Non‑existent fact. Migration Act 1958 ss 53(3), 66, 412(1), 414(1), 476(1)(g), (4)(b) Migration Regulations regs 2.16(1), 5.03(1) Santos v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 74 FCR 334 applied Dawai v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 71 FCR 379 applied Shrestha v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1997] FCA 1051 applied Tabet v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 75 FCR 446 applied Tjandra v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 50 ALD 454 applied Curragh Queensland Mining Ltd v Daniel (1992) 34 FCR 212 applied
NAINA MOHAMED SAIBO MOHAMED NAHEEM v THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS VG 644 OF 1998 SUNDBERG J 1 OCTOBER 1999 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VG 644 OF 1998
BETWEEN: NAINA MOHAMED SAIBO MOHAMED NAHEEM
Applicant
AND: THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: SUNDBERG J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate