Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Secretary, Department of Social Security v Edwards
[1999] FCA 1383
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – dismissal of appeal from decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal.
SOCIAL SECURITY – creation of, and joint and several liability for, debt due to Commonwealth - where partner of respondent pleaded guilty to contraventions of s 1347 Social Security Act 1991, and amounts of various social security benefits paid to partner of respondent as a result of these contraventions became a debt due by partner of respondent to Commonwealth, by virtue of s 1224(1) Social Security Act 1991 - where respondent convicted of charges that he was, contrary to s 5 Crimes Act 1914, knowingly concerned in commission of offences by another person – where respondent made jointly and severally liable for the debt of his partner by virtue of s 1224AB Social Security Act 1991.
SOCIAL SECURITY – waiver of debt due by respondent to Commonwealth –applicable waiver provision the repealed provision s 1237(3) Social Security Act 1991 rather than the subsequently enacted provision s 1237AA – effect of operation of s 8 Acts Interpretation Act 1901 – effect of operation of s 1236A(1) Social Security Act 1991 – whether respondent "convicted of an offence that gave rise to a proportion of a debt" – whether Magistrates Court, in sentencing respondent for breaches of s 5 Crimes Act 1914, "indicated that it imposed a longer custodial sentence on the person because the person was unable… to pay the debt". Social Security Act 1991 s 39(1A), s 1224(1), s 1224AB, s 1236A(1), s 1237(3), s 1237AA Crimes Act 1914 s 5, s 17A Acts Interpretation Act 1901 s 8 SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY v RUPERT FINLAY EDWARDS QG 70 OF 1998 SPENDER J 8 OCTOBER 1999 BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY QG 70 OF 1998
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate