Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Stern v National Australia Bank [1999] FCA 1421 TRADE PRACTICES – misleading and deceptive conduct – whether Bank made false representations concerning the enforceability of loan documents, acceleration clause, and extension of a loan – whether silence constituted misleading conduct – reasonable expectation – where representations were expressions of opinion – whether applicants relied on misleading and deceptive conduct when they entered into guarantees and later an assumption agreement – whether Ministerial consent required before commencement or conclusion of hearing – Trade Practice Act 1974 (Cth) ss 5, 51A, 52 LIMITATION PERIOD – under s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) limitation period runs from date on which cause of action accrued – right to damages under s 82 arises when loss is crystallised or contingency is met - loss accrued under Californian law when judicial foreclosure order as well as deficiency judgment had been given RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT – application for recognition and enforcement of foreign judgment – deficiency judgment of Californian court – defence to enforcement if contrary to Australian public policy – relevant policy identified as policy in s 52 together with s 5 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – whether foreign judgment contrary to Australian public policy – whether foreign law contrary to Australian public policy FOREIGN LAW – choice of law – proof of foreign law a question of fact – expert evidence on content of foreign law – application of foreign law to the facts a matter for the Court of the forum – construction of acceleration clause in a Deed of Trust ESTOPPEL – Anshun estoppel – whether a claim under s 52 could have been raised in the Californian proceedings creating an estoppel from making the claim in the present proceedings WAIVER – application of substantive law of California – intent to relinquish right – whether Bank waived its right to enforce an acceleration clause in a loan by acceptance of payment of interest AGENCY – whether one applicant was agent for Bank when he communicated information given to him by Bank to the other applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate