Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Liew v JNS Technologies (M) Sdn Bhd [1999] FCA 1428 BANKRUPTCY – whether the fact that an appeal is pending is sufficient for an extension of time for compliance with a bankruptcy notice.
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 41(6A)
Garcia v National Australia Bank Limited (1998) 155 ALR 614 referred Re Taylor; ex parte Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1983) 74 FLR 377 cited Bryant v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (unreported, Full Court of the Federal Court, 11 November 1994) cited Benaharon v Fabric Dyeworks (Aust) Pty Ltd [1998] FCA 1109 cited Re Baker; ex parte Baker v Staples (unreported, Federal Court, 4 September 1995) referred Beckwith v Pedler [1999] FCA 1312 cited Re Geard; ex parte Reid (unreported, Federal Court, 11 February 1999) referred Re Smith (unreported, Federal Court, 4 May 1994) cited Agrillo v Codisposto (unreported, Federal Court, 16 December 1994) cited Bryett v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1997) 37 ATR 1411 cited Wenkart v Abignano (unreported, Federal Court, 28 August 1998) cited Byron v Southern Star Group Pty Ltd (1997) 73 FCR 264 followed Re Nguyen; ex parte Commissioner of Taxation (1995) 54 FCR 403 followed Warner v Frost [1999] FCA 830 followed
PAK SUN LIEW v JNS TECHNOLOGIES (M) SDN BHD V 7644 of 1999 WAI FONG LIEW v JNS TECHNOLOGIES (M) SDN BHD V 7645 of 1999 MARY ELLEN STANNARD v JNS TECHNOLOGIES (M) SDN BHD V 7648 of 1999 JOHN NEIL STANNARD v JNS TECHNOLOGIES (M) SDN BHD V 7649 of 1999 KENNY J MELBOURNE 18 OCTOBER 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 7644 OF 1999
BETWEEN: PAK SUN LIEW
Applicant
AND: JNS TECHOLOGIES (M) SDN BHD
Respondent
JUDGE: KENNY J
DATE OF ORDER: 18 OCTOBER 1999
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application under s 41(6A) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the application, including any reserved costs. 3. The time for compliance with the bankruptcy notice No. VN 1309 of 1999 by the applicant be extended to 5.00 pm on 19 October 1999. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate