Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Nixon v Philip Morris (Australia) Ltd [1999] FCA 1429
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Costs of applications for summary dismissal of proceeding –Numerous issues – Mixed fortunes of parties – Apportionment of costs.
MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER NIXON, ALEX TALAY, ROBERT MILNE, VICTOR BRUCE WILLIAMS, SANDRA SHEPARD and GREGORY DURKIN (for themselves and as representing the persons referred to in paragraph 1 of the Statement of Claim)
v
PHILIP MORRIS (AUSTRALIA) LTD and PHILIP MORRIS LTD, W D & H O WILLS HOLDINGS LTD and W D & H O WILLS (AUSTRALIA) LTD and ROTHMANS HOLDINGS LTD and ROTHMANS OF PALL MALL (AUSTRALIA) LTD
N326 of 1999
WILCOX J SYDNEY 20 OCTOBER 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N326 of 1999
BETWEEN: MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER NIXON, ALEX TALAY, ROBERT MILNE, VICTOR BRUCE WILLIAMS, SANDRA SHEPHARD and GREGORY DURKIN (for themselves and as representing the persons referred to in paragraph 1 of the Statement of Claim)
Applicants
AND: PHILIP MORRIS (AUSTRALIA) LTD and PHILIP MORRIS LTD
First Respondent
W D & H O WILLS HOLDINGS LTD and W D & H O WILLS (AUSTRALIA) LTD
Second Respondent
And
ROTHMANS HOLDINGS LTD and ROTHMANS OF PALL MALL (AUSTRALIA) LTD
Third Respondent
JUDGE: WILCOX J
DATE OF ORDER: 20 OCTOBER 1999
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The respondents, Philip Morris (Australia) Ltd, Philip Morris Ltd, W D & H O Wills Holdings Ltd, W D & H O Wills (Australia) Ltd, Rothmans Holdings Ltd and Rothmans of Pall Mall (Australia) Ltd, pay to the applicants, Michael Christopher Nixon, Alex Taley, Robert Milne, Victor Bruce Williams, Sandra Shephard and Gregory Durkin, one half of the costs incurred by the applicants in connection with the Notices of Motion filed by the respondents on 2 July 1999.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate