Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Foster v Senator Amanda Vanstone [1999] FCA 1447
EXTRADITION - validity of surrender warrant - where charges involve allegations of forgery and fraud - limitations on Minister's discretion to accede to extradition requests from Commonwealth countries - no surrender where it would entail injustice, oppression or a penalty regarded as too severe - Minister's consideration of exemption criteria -circumstances where surrender for trivial offences may be oppressive - attention not required to be directed at particulars of allegations - whether Minister nevertheless misled as to extent of monies involved, and fact that charges concerned attempts to obtain, not the receipt of monies - severity of punishment - test to be applied - whether focus is upon the act of surrender, its consequences in terms of the type of punishment or degree of likely penalty, or the particular circumstances of the person charged - relevance of incarceration awaiting extradition - reasonableness of decision. WORDS AND PHRASES - "unjust or oppressive or too severe a punishment" Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) ss 22, 7,11,23,12,16,19,21,52,34 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Fugitive Offenders Act RSC 1985 Fugitive Offenders Act 1881 (UK) Service and Execution of Process Act 1901 (Cth) Fugitive Offenders Act 1967 (UK) s 8 Foster v Attorney-General (1998) 158 ALR 394 Cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21 Cited Kenneally v New Zealand [1999] FCA 1320 Refd to Bannister v New Zealand [1999] FCA 362 Refd to Union of India v Narang [1978] AC 247 Refd to Attorney-General of the Commonwealth v Foster (1999) 84 FCR 582 Cited, Discussed Waterford v Commonwealth (1987) 163 CLR 54 Cited Narain v DPP (1987) 15 FCR 411 Refd to Edmonds v Andrews (1987) 85 FLR 419 Refd to Re Maher [1983] 2 Qd R 695 Refd to Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 Refd to, Cited, Approved R v Chief Registrar of Friendly Societies; ex parte New Cross Building Society [1984] QB 227 Refd to McPhee v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1988) 16 ALD 77 Refd Barrett v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 18 ALD 129 Refd to, Discussed Videto v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1985) 8 FCR 167 Refd to, Discussed Kakis v Government of Cyprus [1978] 1 WLR 779 Cited Perry v Lean & Fry (1985) 39 SASR 515 Cited Binge v Bennett (1988) 13 NSWLR 578 Cited, Refd to R v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Ex parte Launder [1997] 1 WLR 839 Cited Hicks v Martin (1990) 27 FCR 416 Refd to, Discussed Forrest v Kelly (1992) 34 FCR 74 Cited Re Henderson; Henderson v Secretary of State for Home Affairs [1950] 1 All ER 283 Cited, Discussed Zacharia v Republic of Cyprus [1963] AC 634 In Re Gorman [1963] NZLR 17 PETER CLARENCE FOSTER v THE MINISTER FOR CUSTOMS AND JUSTICE SENATOR AMANDA VANSTONE Q 193 of 1999 CARR, MOORE, KIEFEL JJ 22 OCTOBER 1999 BRISBANE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate