Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Royal Queensland Aero Club v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [1999] FCA 1474
INJUNCTION - interlocutory application to restrain the respondent Authority from publishing to interested parties doubts as to the validity of licences which the application for declaratory relief seeks to validate - whether such an injunction would be of any utility as matter heard in open Court and a non-publication order not sought - discussion of balance of convenience Jackson v Stirling Industries Ltd (1987) 162 CLR 612 cited ROYAL QUEENSLAND AERO CLUB v CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY Q 244 OF 1999 DRUMMOND J 19 OCTOBER 1999 BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 244 OF 1999
BETWEEN: ROYAL QUEENSLAND AERO CLUB ACN 009 660 806
Applicant
AND: CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
Respondent
JUDGE: DRUMMOND J
DATE OF ORDER: 19 OCTOBER 1999
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Upon the Civil Aviation Safety Authority's undertaking, that, if it writes to any person in order to inform them of its belief that any act performed by Garth Harris in reliance upon his having had a grade 1 flight instructor's (aeroplane) rating between 30 April 1998 and 6 April 1999 is invalid because Garth Harris did not hold a grade 1 flight instructor's (aeroplane) rating during that period, then it would also inform such persons that it has been aware since 1 April 1999 that Garth Harris did not hold such a rating and that on 28 October 1999, the Federal Court intends to hear Royal Queensland Aero Club's application for a declaration that such activities by Garth Harris are valid notwithstanding that he did not hold a grade 1 flight instructor's (aeroplane) rating, the application for an interlocutory injunction be dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate