Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Phanouvong v Minister for Immigration &
Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1489 MIGRATION - protection visa - Refugee Review Tribunal affirmed decision of Minister's delegate not to grant visa - Tribunal empowered to consider visa application only if application "valid" - whether Tribunal considered a valid application - whether Tribunal correctly applied test "well-founded fear of persecution" - whether Tribunal adequately explained why discrimination did not amount to persecution - whether subjective fear of persecution was well-founded - whether Tribunal engaged in requisite process of speculation. Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 45, s 45(2), s 46, s 47, s 47(3), s 69(1), s 415, s 415(1), s 475(1)(b), s 476(1), s 476(1)(a), s 476(1)(c) Migration Regulations, reg 2.07(1)(a), Sch 1 item 1126, Sch 2 subclass 866 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Hayman [1999] FCA 217 distinguished Tickner v Chapman (1995) 57 FCR 451 applied Prahastono v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (FCA, 8 July 1997, unreported) referred Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 referred Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 referred Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 discussed SOULY PHANOUVONG & ORS v THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS VG 470 of 1998 FINN J 3 NOVEMBER 1999 CANBERRA (HEARD IN MELBOURNE)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VG 470 OF 1998
BETWEEN: SOULY PHANOUVONG
First Applicant
SILALACK PHANOUVONG
Second Applicant
MAJURY PHANOUVONG
Third Applicant
AND: THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate