Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
City of Botany Bay Council v Minister for Transport and Regional Development [1999] FCA 1495
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – operating plan for Sydney airport – decision by Minister under Environment Protection (Impact of Proposals) Act 1974(Cth) that neither an environmental impact statement nor a public environmental report was required – environmental effect of noise – whether constructive failure on the part of the Minister to perform his duty to take into account a particular matter – whether decision by Minister was one to which no reasonable person could have come – environmental assessment action under para 3.1.2(b) of the Administrative Procedures – whether Minister took into account an irrelevant consideration.
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – operating plan for Sydney airport – decision by Minister under Air Services Act 1995 (Cth) to implement airport plan – whether Minister's decision one to which no reasonable person could have come. Air Services Act 1995 (Cth) Environment Protection (Impact of Proposals) Act 1974 (Cth) Administrative Procedures Sinclair v Maryborough Mining Warden (1975) 132 CLR 473 referred to
CITY OF BOTANY BAY COUNCIL V MINISTER FOR TRANSPORT AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT & ORS NG 1268 OF 1998 BLACK CJ, LEE AND WEINBERG JJ
4 NOVEMBER 1999 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES REGISTRY NG 1268 OF 1998
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: CITY OF BOTANY BAY COUNCIL
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR TRANSPORT AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
First Respondent
MINISTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT
Second Respondent
AIRSERVICES AUSTRALIA
Third Respondent
JUDGES: BLACK CJ, LEE AND WEINBERG JJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate