Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Adlam v Bauer [1999] FCA 1504 INDUSTRIAL LAW – union rules – whether particular members of the union's State Council who sat to hear and determine a charge laid against the State Secretary were invincibly biased – whether the proceedings before State Council miscarried. Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth),s209
Australian Workers' Union and Ors v Bowen (No 2) (1948) 77 CLR 601, applied
Dickason v Edwards [1910] 10 CLR 243, applied
Cains v Jenkins (1979) 42 FLR 188, distinguished
Thompson v Hodder (1989) 31 IR 300, distinguished
CAROLYN JENNIFER ADLAM v P BAUER and OTHERS
SG 141 OF 1998
MARSHALL J
MELBOURNE (HEARD IN ADELAIDE)
3 NOVEMBER 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SG 141 OF 1998
BETWEEN: CAROLYN JENNIFER ADLAM
Applicant
AND: P BAUER and OTHERS (as per attached schedule)
Respondent
JUDGE: MARSHALL J
DATE OF ORDER: 3 NOVEMBER 1999
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE (HEARD IN ADELAIDE)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: The applicant be refused leave to amend the rule to show cause.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
SCHEDULE P Bauer First Respondent
S Biddle Second Respondent
D Cridland Third Respondent
I Curry Fourth Respondent
H Early Fifth Respondent
J Gresty Sixth Respondent
P McMahon Seventh Respondent
T Murray Eighth Respondent
A Nicholson Ninth Respondent
P Noack Tenth Respondent
R Parham Eleventh Respondent
D Sibbald Twelfth Respondent
T Taylor Thirteenth Respondent
J Watson Fourteenth Respondent
J Camillo Fifteenth Respondent
J Gee Sixteenth Respondent
M Boddey Seventeenth Respondent
D Bosch Eighteenth Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate