Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Industrial Equity Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [1999] FCA 1533 INCOME TAX – application for review of a decision of the Commissioner of Taxation to issue a Notice under s 264 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ("the Act") – whether form of notice was invalid – construction of s 264(1)(b) of the Act – whether s 264(1)(b) contains a true disjunctive "or" in the phrase "before him or before any officer authorized by him in that behalf" – whether a notice issued pursuant to s 264(1)(b) must specify the person or persons before whom the examinee is required to attend and give evidence Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 264(1)(b) Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1976 (Cth) ss 13, 15
Unity APA Ltd v Humes Ltd (No 2) (1987) VR 474, cited Ormerod v Blaslov (1989) 52 SASR 263, cited Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) v Citibank Ltd (1989) 20 FCR 403, discussed Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Baker (1997) 73 FCR 187, cited Wouters v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (NSW) (1988) 20 FCR 342, considered Johns v Connor (1992) 35 FCR 1, cited Dunkel v Commissioner of Taxation (1990) 27 FCR 524, cited
INDUSTRIAL EQUITY LIMITED and GREGORY KINGSTON COTTAM v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION and JM KILLALY, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
N 1227 OF 1999
GYLES J
SYDNEY
27 OCTOBER 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1227 OF 1999
BETWEEN: INDUSTRIAL EQUITY LIMITED
First Applicant
GREGORY KINGSTON COTTAM
Second Applicant
AND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
First Respondent
JM KILLALY,
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Second Respondent
JUDGE: GYLES J
DATE OF ORDER: 27 OCTOBER 1999
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate