Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd [1999] FCA 1535 CONTRACTS – contract between wholesaler and retailer – wholesaler passed on to retailer a tax by way of a "licence fee" – terms – implied term – whether term as to refund, by wholesaler to retailer, of "licence fee" in certain circumstances an implied term of contract – relevance of proposition that each party, if successful, stood to make a windfall gain – restitution – total failure of consideration – whether wholesaler undertook to perform particular obligation in consideration of payment to it by retailer of "licence fee" – unjust enrichment – nature of concept – whether retention of payments by wholesaler "unjust" in the absence of express or implied term requiring refund and of total failure of consideration – restitution – mistake – whether full amount payable by retailer to wholesaler, including "licence fee", due as a matter of contract – whether alleged mistake caused payment of "licence fee" TRUSTS – constructive trust – "personal" and "proprietary" constructive trusts – whether retailer paid "licence fees" to wholesaler in circumstances where constructive trust should be declared or imposed upon wholesaler in favour of retailer TRADE PRACTICES – conduct that is misleading or deceptive – whether alleged representation as to future matter made in wholesaler's invoice to retailers specifying an amount for "licence fee" WORDS AND PHRASES – "unjust enrichment" – "constructive trust" Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 51A and s52 Business Franchise Licences (Tobacco) Act 1987 (NSW) s 41(3) Ha v State of New South Wales (1997) 189 CLR 465 applied Walter Hammond & Associates Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales (1997) 189 CLR 465 applied Dennis Hotels Pty Ltd v The State of Victoria (1960) 104 CLR 529 cited Dickenson's Arcade Pty Ltd v The State of Tasmania (1974) 130 CLR 177 cited Phillip Morris Limited v The Commissioner of Business Franchises (Victoria) (1989) 167 CLR 399 cited Commissioner of State Revenue (Victoria) v Royal Insurance Australia Ltd (1994) 182 CLR 51 discussed Ling v Commonwealth of Australia (1994) 51 FCR 88 distinguished BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266 applied Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon (1993) 176 CLR 344 applied Shirlaw v Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd [1939] 2 KB 206 cited Pavey & Mathews Pty Ltd v Paul (1987) 162 CLR 221 discussed David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353 applied Woolwich Equitable Building Society v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1993] AC 70 distinguished Hirst v Tolson (1850) 2 Mac & G 134 disapproved Muschinski v Dodds (1985) 160 CLR 583 distinguished Sabemo Pty Ltd v North Sydney Municipal Council [1977] 2 NSWLR 880 distinguished Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Investments Ltd [1970] AC 567 referred to Re Australian Elizabethan Theatre Trust; Lord v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1991) 30 FCR 491 applied Giumelli v Giumelli (1999) 161 ALR 473 discussed 123 East Fifty‑Fourth Street, Inc v United States 157 F 2d 68 discussed Decorative Carpets, Inc v State Board of Equalization 373 P 2d 637 referred to Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137 distinguished Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington London Borough Council [1996] AC 669 cited Commonwealth Quarries (Footscray) Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1938) 59 CLR 111, cited Tanu Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1999) 160 ALR 227, referred to Stephens v The Queen (1978) 139 CLR 315, referred to Maxitherm Boilers Pty Ltd v Pacific Dunlop Ltd [1998] 4 VR 559, cited Chattis Nominees Pty Ltd v Norman Ross Homeworks Pty Ltd (in Liq) (1992) 28 NSWLR 338, cited Hussey v Horne-Payne (1879) 4 App Cas 311, cited Howard Smith & Co Ltd v Varawa (1907) 5 CLR 68, cited Panorama Development (Guildford) Ltd v Fidelis Furnishing Fabrics Ltd [1971] 2 QB 711, cited Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corporation (1984) 156 CLR 41, cited Australian Broadcasting Corporation v XIVth Commonwealth Games Ltd (1988) 18 NSWLR 540, cited Hawkins v Clayton (1988) 164 CLR 539, cited Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410, applied Fibrosa Spolka Akcyjna v Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd [1943] AC 32, applied Rugg v Minett (1809) 11 East 210, referred to Dimskal Shipping Co SA v International Transport Workers Federation [1992] 2 AC 152, considered Goss v Chilcott [1996] AC 788, cited Commonwealth v Ling (1993) 44 FCR 397, cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate