Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Arumugasamy v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1554 IMMIGRATION – error of law – procedural error in failure to make findings – application for review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal refusing to grant protection visa – whether alleged persecution was for a Convention reason – whether social group an artificial construct based only on persecution of members for a non-Convention reason – whether error of law in failure to consider if conduct amounted to persecution – whether inconsistencies in findings – whether suffered persecution for a Convention reason by security forces – whether failure to consider if real chance of persecution in the future despite findings of no past persecution – whether fear assessed as at date of hearing Migration Act (1958) (Cth) ss 476(1)(a) and (e), 430(1) Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees 1951 as amended by the 1973 Protocol Article 1A(2) Minister for Immigration and Ethic Affairs v Respondent A (1995) 57 FCR 309 applied Applicant A v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 190 CLR 225 applied Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 cited PERINBAMOORTHY ARUMUGASAMY v
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS NG 1412 OF 1998 TAMBERLIN J SYDNEY 11 NOVEMBER 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG1412 OF 1998
BETWEEN: PERINBAMOORTHY ARUMUGASAMY
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION
AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 11 NOVEMBER 1999
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: The application is dismissed with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate