Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Shetty v Minister for Immigration Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1601 MIGRATION – Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – well founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of membership of a particular social group – whether Tribunal entitled to isolate question of whether harm feared serious enough to constitute persecution Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36, 476 Applicant A v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 190 CLR 225, distinguished Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379, approved, followed Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 144 ALR 567, approved, followed Kanagasabai v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999]FCA 205, approved, followed Prahastono v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 77 FCR 260, approved, followed JACINTHA ASHOK SHETTY v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 110 of 1999 BRANSON J SYDNEY 18 NOVEMBER 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 110 of 1999
BETWEEN: JACINTHA ASHOK SHETTY
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: BRANSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 18 NOVEMBER 1999
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal be affirmed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 110 of 1999
BETWEEN: JACINTHA ASHOK SHETTY
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: BRANSON J
DATE: 18 NOVEMBER 1999
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction 1 This is an application made under s 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ("the Act") for judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal ("the Tribunal") which affirmed a decision of a delegate of the respondent not to grant to the applicant a protection visa. 2 Section 36 of the Act provides as follows: "(1) There is a class of visas to be known as protection visas. (2) A criterion for a protection visa is that the applicant for the visa is a non-citizen in Australia to whom Australia has protection obligations under the Refugees Convention as amended by the Refugees Protocol." 3 Australia will have protection obligations to the applicant under the Refugees Convention as amended by the Refugees Protocol (together hereafter referred to as the "Refugees Convention") if the applicant: "owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of [her] nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail [herself] of the protection of that country …." (Article 1A(2) of the Refugees Convention)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate