Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Adlam v Noack [1999] FCA 1606 CONTEMPT – penalty – whether contemnor should be cross-examined on hearing for penalty – nature of contempt proceedings – whether contemnor could be questioned in relation to a proposed settlement of overall dispute– whether the fact that fine may be paid by third parties relevant to determination of penalty – factors to be considered in determining penalty – circumstances in which "victim" of contempt could be awarded costs. INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS – whether finding of contempt "prescribed offence" under Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth). Federal Court Rules O 40 r 5, O 40 r 5(2) Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) s 347 Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 (Cth) 197A Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 17 Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union v Mudginberri Station Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 98 followed Flamingo Park Pty Ltd v Dolly Dolly Creation Pty Ltd (1985) 5 FCR 169 followed Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Hickey [1999] FCR 259 followed Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Matthews [1999] FCA 803 followed Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Goldstar Corporation Pty Ltd (Drummond J, 6 November 1998, unreported) followed Viner v Australian Building Constructions Employees' and Builders Labourers' Federation (1981) 56 FLR 5 applied Gregory v Philip Morris Ltd (1987) 74 ALR 300 applied W R Carpenter & Co Pty Ltd v Wollongong Instant Scaffolds Pty Ltd (1992) 36 FCR 10 distinguished Comet Products UK Ltd v Hawkex Plastics Ltd [1971] 2 QB 67 considered Witham v Holloway (1995) 183 CLR 525 considered Hinch v Attorney-General of Victoria (1987) 164 CLR 15 considered Durack v Gallagher (1982) 44 ALR 272 considered Gallagher v Durack (1982) 44 ALR 477 considered Gallagher v Durack (1983) 152 CLR 238 considered Matthews; Real Tech Systems Integration Pty Ltd v Meuross (Lehane J, 21 November 1997, unreported) considered LED Builders Pty Ltd v Eagle Homes Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1213 applied Australian Securities and Industries Commission v Matthews [1999] FCA 803 applied Hudson v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission [1999] FCA 891 considered McIntyre v Perkes (1988) 15 NSWLR 417 considered
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate