Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Kellogg Company v PB Foods Ltd [1999] FCA 1610 TRADE MARKS – appeal against Registrar's dismissal of opposition to registration of word mark "TOUCAN" in respect of class 32 (fruit drinks) – existing registrations of three word and device marks of opponent in respect of class 30 (breakfast cereals) – opponent's existing marks consisting of fanciful cartoon bird character and his name "SAM TOUCAN" – extensive use by opponent of its trade marks since 1964 in connection with promotion of its children's breakfast cereal "Froot Loops" – association between opponent's fruit theme and applicant for registration's fruit drinks – whether use of word mark "TOUCAN" would be likely to cause confusion – use of survey evidence in trade mark cases. Trade Marks Act 1955 (Cth) s 28(a) Nettlefold Advertising Pty Ltd v Nettlefold Signs Pty Ltd (1997) 38 IPR 495, followed Radio Corporation Pty Ltd v Disney (1937) 57 CLR 448, applied Bali Trade Mark [1969] RPC 472, referred to Smith Hayden & Co Ltd's Application (1946) 63 RPC 97, followed Pioneer Hi-Bred Corn Co v Hy-Line Chicks Pty Ltd [1979] RPC 410, cited In re Remfry's Trade Mark (1897) 23 VLR 44, cited Reckitt & Colman (Aust) Ltd v Boden (1945) 70 CLR 84, referred to Southern Cross Refrigerating Co v Toowoomba Foundry Pty Ltd (1954) 91 CLR 592, applied Blount v Registrar of Trade Marks (1998) 83 FCR 50, cited Jafferjee v Scarlett (1937) 57 CLR 115, cited Nettlefold Advertising Pty Ltd v Nettlefold Signs Pty Ltd (1998) 160 ALR 184, referred to Musidor BV v Tansing (t/a Apple Music House) (1994) 29 IPR 203, cited Shoshana Pty Ltd v 10th Cantanae Pty Ltd (1987) 79 ALR 279, cited TV-am plc v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd (ATN Channel 7) (1988) 12 IPR 85, cited Arnotts Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1990) 24 FCR 313, cited Sterling Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd v Johnson & Johnson Australia Pty Ltd (1990) 96 ALR 277, cited Interlego AG v Croner Trading Pty Ltd (1991) 102 ALR 379, cited State Government Insurance Corporation v GIO (NSW) (1991) 28 FCR 511, cited Gas Corporation v Phasetwo Nominees Pty Ltd (1998) ATPR 41-644, cited Centurion Roller Shutters Pty Ltd v Automatic Technology (Australia) Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1118, cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate