Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pawel v Australian Industrial Relations Commission [1999] FCA 1660 INDUSTRIAL LAW - Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) – unlawful termination – application dismissed on basis that termination not at initiative of employer – issue of jurisdictional fact – application for leave to appeal – proper approach to be taken by Full Bench ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – prerogative writs – application for certiorari and mandamus – administrative tribunal
Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) ss 45, 170CB(1), 170CE(1) Industrial Relations Act 1988 (Cth) Constitution ss 51(i), 51(xx), 51(xxxix), 52(ii), 122 Victoria v The Commonwealth (Industrial Relations Act Case) (1996) 187 CLR 416, referred to The King v Blakeley; Ex parte the Association of Architects, Engineers, Surveyors and Draughtsmen of Australia (1950) 82 CLR 54, cited Minister for Immigration Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 162 ALR 577, referred to The Queen v Judges of the Federal Court of Australia; Ex parte W.A. National Football League (1979) 143 CLR 190, cited Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Giudice (1998) 159 ALR 1, referred to Singer v Berghouse (No 2) (1994) 181 CLR 201, referred to The King v Connell; Ex parte Hetton Bellbird Collieries Ltd (1944) 69 CLR 407, cited Mohazab v Dick Smith Electronics Pty Ltd (No 2) (1995) 62 IR 200, applied Qantas Airways Limited v Christie (1998) 193 CLR 280, cited Sammartino v Commissioner Foggo [1999] FCA 1231, cited Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163, followed Mann v Ross (1999) 88 FCR 274, considered Haining v Drake (1998) 87 FCR 248, applied Re Coldham; Ex parte Brideson (1990) 170 CLR 267, referred to KARL PAWEL v THE AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
V 381 of 1999 constituted by SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT POLITES, SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON AND COMMISSIONER GAY (respectively constituting a Full Bench of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission) BRANSON, MARSHALL AND DOWSETT JJ MELBOURNE 10 DECEMBER 1999
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate