Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [1999] FCA 1681

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [1999] FCA 1681 MIGRATION – application for protection visa – whether reasons of Refugee Review Tribunal failed to set out findings on questions of material fact – whether a failure to observe procedures requires by the Act in connection with the making of the decision Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 430(1)(c), 476(1)(a), 481(1) Muralidharan v Minister (1996) 62 FCR 402 at 413-416 followed Paramanathan v Minister (1998) 160 ALR 24 at 27, 31, 37, 47 and 63 followed Logenthiran v Minister [1998] FCA 1691 followed Hughes v Minister [1998] 53 ALD 607 followed Perampalan v Minister [1999] FCA 165 followed Sellamuthu v Minister [1999] FCA 247 followed Voitenko v Minister [1999] FCA 428 followed Thevendram v Minister [1999] FCA 182 followed Borsa v Minister [1999] FCA 348 at [26] and [27] followed Addo v Minister [1999] FCA 940 followed Nguyen v Nguyen (1990) 169 CLR 245 at 269 applied Qantas Airways Ltd v Cornwall (1999) 84 FCR 483 at 489-490 applied White v White [1947] VLR 434 at 441 applied Minister v Eshetu (1999) 162 ALR 577 distinguished Bushell v Repatriation Commission (1992) 175 CLR 408 at 424-425 applied Our Town Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1987) 16 FCR 465 at 479-480 followed Kandiah v Minister [1998] FCA 1145 followed Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd v Wraith (1983) 48 ALR 500 at 507 followed ARM Constructions Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1986) 10 FCR 197 at 203-205 mentioned Commonwealth v Pharmacy Guild of Australia (1989) 91 ALR 65 at 88 applied Commissioner of Taxation v Osborne (1990) 26 FCR 63 applied Statham v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 16 ALD 723 at 724 applied Public Service Board of New South Wales v Osmond (1985) 159 CLR 656 at 670 mentioned Repatriation Commission v O'Brien (1985) 155 CLR 422 at 445-446 mentioned Nguyen v Minister (1998) 88 FCR 206 at 215-216 mentioned Body Corporate Strata Plan No. 4166 v Stirling Properties Pty Ltd [1984] VR 903 at 912 mentioned