Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Seafarers' Retirement Fund Pty Ltd v Oppenhuis [1999] FCA 1683
SUPERANNUATION – disability benefit – non-discretionary decision of trustee – jurisdiction of Superannuation Complaints Tribunal to hear complaints in relation to non-discretionary decisions – whether review conducted by the Tribunal of the trustee's decision is a hearing de novo – whether Tribunal has power to dispense with compliance with requirements of Trust Deed
STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION – whether an amending Act enacted "to avoid doubt" is declaratory and therefore intended to be retrospective Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993 (Cth) ss 14, 14AA, 18(1)(d), 36, 37 and 41 Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) s 58 Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 15
Wilkinson v CARE Superannuation (1998) 79 FCR 469 – cited Collins v AMP Superannuation Ltd (1997) 75 FCR 565 – cited Attorney-General (Cth) v Breckler (1999) 163 ALR 576 – considered Commissioner of Stamps v Telegraph Investment Co Pty Ltd (1995) 184 CLR 453 – cited Rodway v The Queen (1990) 169 CLR 515 – cited Harding v Commissioners of Stamps (Qld) [1898] AC 769 – cited Inland Revenue Commissioners v Joiner – [1975] 1 WLR 1701 – cited Brandy v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1995) 183 CLR 245 – cited Republic of South Africa v Dutton (1997) 77 FCR 128 – considered Re Brindle; Ex parte FB and FA McMahon Pty Ltd (1992) 35 FCR 506 – applied Harris v Calladine (1991) 172 CLR 84 - cited
SEAFARERS' RETIREMENT FUND PTY LTD (as Trustee of the SEAFARERS' RETIREMENT FUND) VG 165 of 1997 JUDGE: MERKEL J DATE: 3 DECEMBER 1999 PLACE: MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VG 165 OF 1997
BETWEEN: SEAFARERS' RETIREMENT FUND PTY LTD (as Trustee of the SEAFARERS' RETIREMENT FUND)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate