Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Major v State of South Australia [1999] FCA 1684 INDUSTRIAL LAW – Respondent refused to extend applicant's period of special leave without pay – whether that refusal together with respondent's threat of disciplinary action against the applicant constituted injury to the applicant in his employment within the meaning of s298K(1)(b) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) ("the Act") or alteration of his position to his prejudice within the meaning of s298K(1)(c) of the Act – whether any such injury or alteration occurred in part for reasons prohibited by s298L(1)(a) and (m) of the Act. Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) s298K, s298L Technical and Further Education Regulations 1998 regs16(3), 37, 68 Technical and Further Education Act (SA) 1975 Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia [No 3] (1998) 72 ALJR 873, applied
JOHN RIDGEWAY MAJOR -v- THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
S48 OF 1999 MARSHALL J 3 DECEMBER 1999 ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S48 OF 1999
BETWEEN: JOHN RIDGEWAY MAJOR
Applicant
AND: THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Respondent
JUDGE: MARSHALL J
DATE OF ORDER: 3 DECEMBER 1999
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S48 OF 1999
BETWEEN: JOHN RIDGEWAY MAJOR
Applicant
AND: THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Respondent
JUDGE: MARSHALL J
DATE: 3 DECEMBER 1999
PLACE: ADELAIDE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This is an application for orders pursuant to s298U of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) ("the Act"). The applicant, Mr Major, is the Secretary of the South Australian branch of the Australian Education Union ("the Union"). He is also an employee of the State of South Australia in its Department of Education, Training and Employment ("the Department"). He has not been physically engaged in his duties in the Department and its predecessors since January 1984 when he was granted special leave without pay to commence employment with a predecessor of the Union. Mr Major received successive periods of extension of such special leave until 28 February 1999. 2 The proceeding before the Court arises as a result of the failure of the respondent to accede to Mr Major's request to grant a further period of special leave without pay beyond 28 February 1999 until 31 December 2001 and its intention to proceed with disciplinary charges against him in the event that he does not resign from the Department.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate