Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rajaratnam v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1707 MIGRATION – Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – application for protection visa – whether error of law – use by Refugee Review Tribunal of word 'motivation' rather than 'for reasons of …' – whether matters noted by Refugee Review Tribunal overlooked in reaching decision – assessment of probability that event may occur – whether Refugee Review Tribunal based assessment only on past event – whether procedures required by the Act observed in connection with the making of the decision – whether failure by Refugee Review Tribunal to provide proper written reasons for decision Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36, 430, 476 Minister of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Sarrazola [1999] FCA 1134 (1999) 166 ALR 641, referred to Applicant A v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 190 CLR 225, cited Ram v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1995) 57 FCR 565, cited Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559, cited Abdalla v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 51 ALD 11, followed Logenthiran v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (Wilcox, Lindgren and Merkel JJ unreported, 21 December 1998), followed Perampalam v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 165, (1999) 55 ALD 431, followed Thevendram v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 182, followed MANUEL RAJARATNAM v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 777 of 1999 BRANSON J SYDNEY 9 DECEMBER 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 777 of 1999
BETWEEN: MANUEL RAJARATNAM
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate