Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lee v Aerial Taxi Cabs Co-operative Society Ltd [1999] FCA 1727 INDUSTRIAL LAW – application pursuant to s 127A of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) ("the Act") on the ground that a contract between the applicant, a taxi driver, and the respondent, a co-operative society which operates the only taxi network in the Australian Capital Territory ("the Driver's Agreement") was unfair and harsh – by entering into the Driver's Agreement the applicant agreed to comply with the respondent's by-laws and disciplinary procedures in return, inter alia, for the use of its radio system – whether the Driver's Agreement was a "contract" for the purposes of s 127A of the Act in its own right or as collateral to a contract with the taxi owner RESTRAINT OF TRADE – whether the necessity for the applicant to subject himself to the by-laws of the respondent over which he had no control and to the respondent's disciplinary procedures constituted a restraint of trade – whether the restraint affords no more than adequate protection to the interests of the respondent Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) s 127A(1) Motor Traffic Act 1936 (ACT) Taxi and Private Hire Car Regulations (ACT) Taxi Industry (Contract Drivers) Contract Determination 1984 (NSW) Finch v Herald & Weekly Times Ltd (1996) 65 IR 239, referred to Dillon v Gange (1941) 64 CLR 253, applied Northern District Radio Taxicab Co-operative Ltd v Commissioner of Stamp Duties [1975] 1 NSWLR 346, applied Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) v De Luxe Red & Yellow Cabs Co-operative (Trading) Society Ltd (1998) 82 FCR 507, applied Stevens v Brodribb Sawmilling Co Pty Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 16, referred to Queensland Co-operative Milling Association Ltd v Pamag Pty Ltd (1973) 133 CLR 260, cited Amoco Australia Pty Ltd v Rocca Bros Motor Engineering Co Pty Ltd (1973) 133 CLR 288, cited Adamson v NSW Rugby League Ltd (1991) 31 FCR 242, applied Buckley v Tutty (1971) 125 CLR 353, applied Eastham v Newcastle United Football Club Ltd [1964] 1 Ch 413, applied Peters (WA) Ltd v Petersville Ltd [1999] FCA 1245, applied McEllistrim v Ballymacelligot Co-operative Agricultural & Dairy Society Ltd [1919] AC 548, referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate