Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Secretary of the Department of Family & Community Services v Sammut [1999] FCA 1735
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – discretionary powers – loss of benefit entitlement for preclusion period where lump sum compensation received – discretion to reduce preclusion period – whether adequate reasons provided – whether error in identification of amount repayable SOCIAL WELFARE AND SECURITY – job search and sickness allowance – loss of benefit entitlement for preclusion period where lump sum compensation received – discretion to reduce preclusion period – ethical duty of solicitors concerning compensation settlements Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) ss 17, 23, 1165(2AA), 1166, 1184 Trimboli v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1989) 86 ALR 64, followed Secretary, Department of Social Security v Ellis (1997) 46 ALD 1, followed Haidar v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1998) 157 ALR 359, followed SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES v ANNETTE SAMMUT N 683 of 1999 BRANSON J SYDNEY 15 DECEMBER 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 683 of 1999
BETWEEN: SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
Applicant
AND: ANNETTE SAMMUT
Respondent
JUDGE: BRANSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 15 DECEMBER 1999
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal ("the Tribunal") be set aside. 2. The matter be remitted to the Tribunal to be heard and decided according to law. 3. The Tribunal to be at liberty to hear further evidence. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate