Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Oak Valley (Maralinga) Inc v Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Commission [1999] FCA 1751 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – alleged insufficiency of reasons – application pursuant to s 13 of the Administrative Decisions Judicial Review Act 1977 (Cth) – whether documents supplied pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) and pursuant to discovery can satisfy a decision-maker's obligations – effect of secrecy provisions in the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission Act 1989 (Cth). Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 13, 13A and 14 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission Act 1989 (Cth) ss 14, 22, 45A, 90, 92 and 94 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Nestle Australia Ltd (1986) 12 FCR 257 considered Australian Institute of Marine and Power Engineers v Secretary, Department of Transport (1986) 71 ALR 73 followed Hatfield v Health Insurance Commission (1987) 77 ALR 103 cited Re Palmer and Minister for the Capital Territory (1978) 23 ALR 196 cited Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd v Wraith (1983) 48 ALR 500 cited Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Ltd v Taylor (1987) 18 FCR 498 cited Soldatow v Australia Council (1991) 28 FCR 1 applied Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 applied ARM Constructions Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1986) 65 ALR 343 applied
OAK VALLEY (MARALINGA) INCORPORATED v ABORIGINAL & TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER COMMISSION
SG 132 OF 1998 O'LOUGHLIN J 21 DECEMBER 1999 ADELAIDE (Heard in Darwin)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SG 132 OF 1998
BETWEEN: OAK VALLEY (MARALINGA) INCORPORATED
Applicant
AND: ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER COMMISSION
Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate