Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Santhikumar v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1777 MIGRATION – appeal from decision of primary Judge dismissing application for review of decision by Refugee Review Tribunal – whether error of law – whether failure to consider and make findings on evidence and submissions –adverse findings of credibility –inconsistent evidence – whether actual bias – pre-judgment – nature of appellant's fear – fear of extortion – reasonableness of relocation WORDS AND PHRASES – "actual bias", "extortion", "relocation" Perampalam v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 84 FCR 274 discussed SUBRAMANIAM SANTHIKUMAR & ORS v
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 851 of 1999 EINFELD, LINDGREN AND TAMBERLIN JJ SYDNEY 23 DECEMBER 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 851 OF 1999
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SUBRAMANIAM SANTHIKUMAR
FIRST APPELLANT
SANTHINI SANTHIKUMAR
SECOND APPELLANT
SANKAMI SANTHIKUMAR
THIRD APPELLANT
SANGAVI SANTHIKUMAR
FOURTH APPELLANT
NESAMANY KANAGASABAPATHY
FIFTH APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION
AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: EINFELD, LINDGREN AND TAMBERLIN JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 23 DECEMBER 1999
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 851 OF 1999
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SUBRAMANIAM SANTHIKUMAR
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate