Tutugri v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1785

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Tutugri v Minister For Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1785 MIGRATION – review of decision of Migration Review Tribunal affirming a decision of the Minister to refuse to grant the applicant a Bridging E visa – whether Tribunal erred in finding hat applicant did not satisfy prescribed criteria – whether Tribunal could require security under s 269 when authorised officer had not done so – whether Tribunal gave adequate reasons. Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 36 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 15, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 37A, 38, 45(2), 47, 48, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 116(1)(b), 116(3), 172, 189, 196(1), 196(3), 269, 347, 348, 349, 367(1), 368, 475(1)(a), 476(1)(a), 476(1)(d), 476(1)(e), 476(1)(g) Federal Court Rules O 80 Migration Regulations 1994 regs 2.02, 2.03, 2.07, 2.10(1)(b)(iv), (3), (4), 2.24, 2.40(1), (10), 2.43(1), (2), 4.10(b)(i), Items 1305, 1305(3)(a), (b), (ba), (c), 8101, 050,2, 050.211, (1), (2), 050.212(1), (9), 050.213, 050.244, 050.221, 050.614 Constitution of the Commonwealth s 71 Cabal v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 11 cited Martin v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] 1256 cited Comcare v Burton [1998] FCA 1144 cited Lees v Comcare [1999] FCA 753 cited Muralidharan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1996) 62 FCR 402 cited Hindi v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1988) 20 FCR 1 cited M. Crock Immigration and Refugee Law in Australia (The Federation Press, Leichkardt, NSW, 1998) ZUU TUTUGRI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS LEE J 17 DECEMBER 1999 PERTH

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W 69 OF 1999

BETWEEN: ZUU TUTUGRI

Applicant

AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS