Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA McMullin v ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1814 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application to reopen previous determination of categories of persons to whom respondent owed a duty not to cause pure economic loss – Judgment not yet entered – Circumstances under which the Court should allow reopening of such an issue - Whether the decision in Perre v Apand Pty Ltd establishes that previous determination was erroneous – Application refused. Perre v Apand Pty Ltd [1999] HCA 36, 164 ALR 606 considered
BRIAN McMULLIN and LEONE MARGARET McMULLIN v ICI AUSTRALIA OPERATIONS PTY LTD, ICI AUSTRALIA LIMITED and CROP CARE AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED NG305 of 1995 WILCOX J 23 DECEMBER 1999 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG305 of 1995
BETWEEN: BRIAN McMULLIN and LEONE MARGARET McMULLIN
Applicants
AND: ICI AUSTRALIA OPERATIONS PTY LTD
First Respondent
ICI AUSTRALIA LIMITED
Second Respondent
CROP CARE AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED
Third Respondent
JUDGE: WILCOX J
DATE: 23 DECEMBER 1999
PLACE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application of the applicants to reopen the issue of the categories of persons to whom the respondents owed a common law duty of care be refused. 2. The applicants pay the costs of the respondents in relation to that application, including the costs connected with the provision of written submissions, but limited to one-half of the costs associated with the hearing on 9 December 1999. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG305 of 1995
BETWEEN: BRIAN McMULLIN and LEONE MARGARET McMULLIN
Applicants
AND: ICI AUSTRALIA OPERATIONS PTY LTD
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate