Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Montes-Granados v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 60 PRECEDENT – whether the decision in Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf is binding on a single judge – whether views expressed in Xu v Minister are obiter dicta not forming part of the ratio decidendi. COSTS – whether, where application is dismissed, but reasoning of the Refugee Review Tribunal was unsatisfactory, a costs order in favour of the Minister can be refused – whether resort to rights given by an international convention should not be discouraged by adverse costs order – bearing on costs of the administrative law character of the case. MIGRATION – application from Refugee Review Tribunal – whether s 430(1)(c) gives rise to a ground of appeal - whether the decision in Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf is binding on a single judge – whether views expressed in Xu v Minister are obiter dicta not forming part of the ratio decidendi – internal refuge - whether, where application is dismissed, but reasoning of the Tribunal was unsatisfactory, a costs order in favour of the Minister can be refused – whether resort to rights given by an international convention should not be discouraged by adverse costs order – bearing on costs of the administrative law character of the case. Randhawa v Minister for Immigration (1994) 52 FCR 437 applied Abdalla v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 51 ALD 11 referred to Regina v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Robinson [1998] QB 929 referred to R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal; Ex parte Jonah (1985) Imm A R 7 referred to Perampalam v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 84 FCR 274 applied Alphonsus v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 289 referred to Eshetu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 71 FCR 300 referred to Xu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 174 discussed Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [1999] FCA 1681 applied Nguyen v Nguyen (1990) 169 CLR 245 applied Qantas Airways Ltd v Cornwall (1999) 84 FCR 483 at 489 applied Byrne v Australian Airlines Limited (1994) 47 FCR 300 applied Australian Securities Commission v Marlborough Goldmines Ltd (1993) 177 CLR 485 applied Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Prathapan (1998) 86 FCR 95 applied Austen v Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd (unreported, Burchett J, 26 August 1993) applied Verna Trading Pty Ltd v New India Assurance Co Ltd [1991] 1 VR 129 applied Donald Campbell & Co v Pollak [1927] AC 732 applied Tekmat Investments Pty Ltd v Ward (1988) 81 ALR 278 referred to Sundararaj v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 76 referred to Sundararaj v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 692 applied Shelton v Repatriation Commission (1999) 85 FCR 587 referred to Ahnee v Director of Public Prosecutions [1999] 2 WLR 1305 referred to Q v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1202 referred to Muli v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1155 referred to WALTER MONTES-GRANADOS v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 622 of 1999 BURCHETT J 4 FEBRUARY 2000 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate