Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Cong Tam Dang v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 73 MIGRATION – Deportation of non-citizens who have committed serious crimes – the requirements of the Ministerial Policy – the need to balance all relevant considerations – a two-stage process not required – whether the Tribunal substituted its own opinion for those of experts – whether the Tribunal breached "natural justice" by not alerting the applicant's representatives to the adverse view it had taken of certain evidence in the applicant's case – whether language used by the Tribunal created an apprehension of bias Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 200 and 201 Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 33 Gascor v Ellicott [1997] 1 VR 332 applied Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs v Gray (1994) 50 FCR 189 considered Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 followed Re Gogebakan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1987) 6 AAR 544 referred to Gumus v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1991) 30 FCR 145 referred to Percerep v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 86 FCR 483 referred to Marelic v Comcare (1993) 121 ALR 114 distinguished Meadows v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 54 ALD 654 distinguished CONG TAM DANG v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 157 OF 1999 DRUMMOND, MATHEWS AND MANSFIELD JJ 15 FEBRUARY 2000 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 157 OF 1999
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: CONG TAM DANG
APPELLANT AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: DRUMMOND, MATHEWS AND MANSFIELD JJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate