Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kamal Raj v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 74 MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a decision of the Migration Review Tribunal to refuse to grant the applicant a visa as a "special need relative" JURISDICTION – whether the Court had jurisdiction to entertain the application under s 478(1)(b) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the application for judicial review had been lodged with a Registry of the Court within twenty-eight days of the applicant being notified of the decision of which review was sought – whether the Tribunal had made a "decision" to affirm the decision under review within the meaning of s 349(2)(a) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether that decision was "given orally" or "handed down" in the manner required by s 368 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the applicant was "notified" of the decision in the manner required by s 368 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) GROUNDS FOR SEEKING JUDICIAL REVIEW – whether the decision of the Tribunal was affected by actual bias within the meaning of s 476(1)(f) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – assessment by the Tribunal of the relevance of a psychologist's report – reference by the presiding member to circumstances affecting a member of her family – scepticism and impatience on the part of the presiding member WORDS AND PHRASES – "decision" Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 349(2), 368, 368A, 368B, 368C, 368D, 379A, 476(1)(f), 478(1)(b) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 1.03 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 referred to Tuamoheloa v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (Heerey J, 4 November 1998, unreported) referred to Minister for Immigration v Teo (1995) 57 FCR 194 referred to Huang v Minister for Immigration (1996) 71 FCR 95 referred to Geng v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 951 applied KAMAL RAJ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 1104 OF 1999 LEHANE J 10 FEBRUARY 2000 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate