Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sandhu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 83 MIGRATION – Refugee Review Tribunal refused protection visa without hearing oral evidence of applicant – applicant had expressed desire to give oral evidence but request was overlooked – Tribunal of its own motion reheard application – whether Tribunal empowered to rehear application once determined – whether Tribunal functus officio – Refugee Review Tribunal refused protection visa without hearing oral evidence of applicant – applicant had expressed desire to give evidence but request was overlooked – Tribunal of its own motion reheard application and again refused visa – Tribunal constituted by same person for both decisions – whether in circumstances second decision of Tribunal induced or affected by actual bias. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 36 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj [1999] FCA 1806 followed Sun Zhan Qui v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 81 FCR 71 considered Baljit Singh v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1542 considered HARPREET KAUR SANDHU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS S 65 OF 1999 MANSFIELD J 10 FEBRUARY 2000 ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 65 OF 1999
BETWEEN: HARPREET KAUR SANDHU
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J
DATE OF ORDER: 10 FEBRUARY 2000
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application is dismissed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 65 OF 1999
BETWEEN: HARPREET KAUR SANDHU
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate