Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CFMEU v Master Builders' Association of Victoria (No 1) [2000] FCA 168 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS – Interlocutory injunction – protected action – anti‑suit injunction – proposed action for damages by employers against Union – whether proposed proceeding will include protected action – intent to coerce Union not to make certified agreement. Workplace Relations Act 1966 (Cth): s 166A, s 170MT, s 170NC Australian Workers' Union v Yallourn Energy Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 65 considered National Workforce Pty Ltd v Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union [1998] 3 VR 265 cited Bullock v Federated Furnishing Trades Society of Australasia (No 1) (1985) 5 FCR 464 cited Australian Paper Limited v Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (1998) 81 IR 15 cited CONSTRUCTION FORESTRY MINING AND ENERGY UNION v MASTER BUILDERS' ASSOCIATION OF VICTORIA & ORS (No 1) V 59 of 2000 GOLDBERG J 25 FEBRUARY 2000 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 59 of 2000
BETWEEN: CONSTRUCTION FORESTRY MINING AND ENERGY UNION
Applicant
AND: MASTER BUILDERS' ASSOCIATION OF VICTORIA
(ACN 004 255 654)
First Respondent
BECTON CORPORATION PTY LTD
(ACN 006 031 581)
Second Respondent
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (AUST) PTY LTD
(ACN 005 490 773)
Third Respondent
KANE CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD
(ACN 007 354 396)
Fourth Respondent
HOOKER COCKRAM LIMITED
(ACN 004 282 599)
Fifth Respondent
LU SIMON BUILDERS PTY LTD
(ACN 006 137 220)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate