Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Ismail v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 194 MIGRATION – protection visa - application for review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal ("the Tribunal") – whether the Tribunal observed procedures required by the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) to be observed in connection with the making of a decision – whether reasons of the Tribunal contained a contradiction or inconsistency – whether s 430 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) sets out a procedure which the Act requires to be observed in relation to the making of a decision – if failure to comply with s 430 whether appropriate to direct Tribunal to give adequate reasons - whether the Tribunal erred in law in concluding that the applicant could reasonably be expected to relocate to Colombo Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 430, 476, 480 Randhawa v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 52 FCR 437 Xu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1741. Yusuf v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1681 MOHAMED ZACKY MOHAMED ISMAIL v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 1285 OF 1999 EMMETT J 23 FEBRUARY 2000 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1285 OF 1999
BETWEEN: MOHAMED ZACKY MOHAMED ISMAIL
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT JUDGE: EMMETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 23 FEBRUARY 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1285 OF 1999
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate