Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pegasus Gold Inc v Bateman Project Engineering Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 201 PEGASUS GOLD INC & ORS v BATEMAN PROJECT ENGINEERING PTY LIMITED & ORS NG 471 OF 1998 JUDGE: MATHEWS J
DATE: 24 FEBRUARY 2000 PLACE: SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 471 OF 1998
BETWEEN: PEGASUS GOLD INC
FIRST APPLICANT
PEGASUS GOLD CORPORATION
SECOND APPLICANT
PEGASUS GOLD AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED
THIRD APPLICANT
AND: BATEMAN PROJECT ENGINEERING PTY LIMITED
FIRST RESPONDENT
KINHILL PACIFIC PTY LIMITED
SECOND RESPONDENT
KILBORN ENGINEERING PACIFIC PTY LIMITED
THIRD RESPONDENT
SVEDALA AUSTRALIA LIMITED
CROSS-RESPONDENT TO FIRST CROSS-CLAIM
AUSTRALIAN MINING CONSULTANTS
CROSS-RESPONDENT TO SECOND CROSS-CLAIM
GARCHEL
CROSS-RESPONDENT TO THIRD CROSS-CLAIM
KNIGHT PIESOLD
CROSS-RESPONDENT TO FOURTH CROSS-CLAIM
MINING & RESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
CROSS-RESPONDENT TO FIFTH CROSS-CLAIM
RESOURCE SERVICE GROUP
CROSS-RESPONDENT TO SIXTH CROSS-CLAIM JUDGE: MATHEWS J
DATE OF ORDER: 24 FEBRUARY 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. BKK pay Svedala's costs of and incidental to the notice of motion filed on 27 September, but to include only one-third of Svedala's costs of attending at court on 6 and 7 December 1999. 2. BKK to pay the costs forthwith. Svedala be granted leave pursuant to order 62 rule 3(iii) of the Federal Court Rules to proceed to a taxation of costs forthwith. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate