Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Van Phuc Diep v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 272
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to affirm a decision of a delegate of the Minister to order the deportation of the applicant under s 200 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the Tribunal erred, inter alia, in its interpretation and application of paragraphs 22(b), 22(e) and 24(c) of the General Directions – Criminal Deportation No 9 Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 200, 201 General Directions – Criminal Deportation No 9, pars 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 21, 22, 24
Butescu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1713, referred to Cong Tam Dang v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 73, referred to Rokobatini v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1238, referred to Percerep v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 86 FCR 483, referred to VAN PHUC DIEP v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 1047 OF 1999 LEHANE J 14 MARCH 2000 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1047 OF 1999
BETWEEN: VAN PHUC DIEP
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: LEHANE J
DATE OF ORDER: 14 MARCH 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed; 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1047 OF 1999
BETWEEN: VAN PHUC DIEP
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate