Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Matthews v Australian Securities & Investments Commission [2000] FCA 288 JURISDICTION - Corporations Law - federal jurisdiction conferred on Federal Court by s 51 Corporations Act 1989 (Cth) in respect of matters arising under the Corporations Law of the ACT - application filed in Federal Court which refers to the Corporations Law taken to be a reference to the Corporations Law of the ACT.
JURISDICTION – court orders - order of a superior court made in excess of jurisdiction is "voidable" and valid and enforceable until set aside.
WORDS AND PHRASES – "internet". Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 1989 (Cth) ss 1(1), 1B(1), 1C(2), 1D(1), 5, 7, 11, 11(6) Circuit Layouts Act 1989 (Cth) s 41 Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) s 131B Corporations Act 1989 (Cth) Pt 8 (ss 37 – 48); ss 3(1), 5, 13, 14, 14(2), 14(3), 14(4), 14(5), 50, 51, 82 Corporations Law ss 781, 782, 783, 1324, 1324(1) Corporations Legislation Amendment Act 1990 (Cth) Designs Act 1906 (Cth) s 40I Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 5(2) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B(1A)(c) Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (Cth) s 7(5) Patents Act 1990 (Cth) s 158 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) s 195 Federal Court Rules O 80 Corporations (NSW) Act 1990 (NSW) ss 3, 7, 10, 66, 68 Federal Courts (State Jurisdiction) Act 1999 (NSW) Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) The Constitution Ch III; ss 51, 51(xx), 71 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Matthews (1999) 32 ACSR 404 referred to Re Wakim, Ex parte McNally, (Spinks v Prentice) (1999) 73 ALJR 839 applied Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Matthews (1999) 32 ACSR 519 referred to Attorney-General (NSW) v Mayas Pty Ltd (1988) 14 NSWLR 342 distinguished United Telecasters Sydney Ltd v Hardy (1991) 23 NSWLR 323 distinguished Pelechowski v Registrar, Court of Appeal (1999) 73 ALJR 687 distinguished Cameron v Cole (1944) 68 CLR 571 applied Re Zagoridis; Ex parte Q'Plas Group Pty Ltd (1990) 27 FCR 108 applied R v Sagacio; Ex parte Katelaris (1990) 99 FLR 439 applied Autistic Association of New South Wales v Dodson [1999] FCA 715 applied Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Merribee Pastoral Industries Pty Ltd (1998) 84 FCR 367 applied Robins v Incentive Dynamics Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1651 applied Westpac Banking Corporation v Paterson (1999) 167 ALR 377 applied Elders Limited v Swinbank [2000] FCA 56 applied AMIEU v Mudginberri Station Pty Ltd (1986) 65 ALR 683 applied Bond v The Queen [2000] HCA 13 referred to Fencott v Muller (1983) 152 CLR 570 referred to Edensor Nominees Pty Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (1999) 33 ACSR 237 referred to Boys v Australian Securities Commission (1997) 24 ACSR 1 referred to STEPHEN LEWIS MATTHEWS v AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES & INVESTMENTS COMMISSION N 617 OF 1999
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate