Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Fernando v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 324 MIGRATION – refugees – application for review of Refugee Review Tribunal decision – whether time limit may be extended Migration Act 1958 (Cth)s 412(1)(b) Migration Regulations reg 4.31(2)(b) Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 153 ALR 491 applied Nguyen v MW Gerkens, Refugee Review Tribunal (6 October 1996, Ryan J) mentioned Santos v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 144 ALR 229 (Tamberlin J) mentioned Dawai v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 71 FCR 379 (Moore J) mentioned Shrestha Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1997] FCA 1051 (Sackville J) mentioned Tjandra v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 276 (Kiefel J) mentioned Ismail v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 1654 (Wilcox J) mentioned Singh v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 353 (Wilcox J) mentioned Naheem v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1360 (Sundberg J) mentioned Singh v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 506 (Hill J) mentioned Singh v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 613 (Einfeld J) mentioned Tabet v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 75 FCR 446 (Mansfield J) mentioned Wang v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 71 FCR 386 (Merkel J) mentioned Accident Compensation Commission v Murphy [1988] VR 444 discussed Montreal Street Railway Co v Normandin [1917] AC 170 at 175 discussed Tasker v Fullwood [1978] 1 NSWLR 20 at 24 mentioned Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for Immigration (1992) 176 CLR 1 at 38 applied Minister for Immigration v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273 at 287 mentioned Newcrest Mining WA Ltd v Commonwealth (1997) 147 ALR 42 at 148 mentioned Simsek v McPhee (1982) 148 CLR 636 at 643 per Stephen J followed Scurr v Brisbane City Council (No 5) (1973) 133 CLR 242 at 256-257 applied Victoria v The Commonwealth (1975) 134 CLR 81 at 179 mentioned Australian Iron & Steel Ltd v Hoogland (1962) 108 CLR 471 at 488 Windeyer J mentioned O'Reilly v Mackman [1983] 2 AC 237 at 284 mentioned Caswell v Dairy Produce Quota Tribunal for England and Wales [1990] 2 AC 738 mentioned Maxwell v Murphy (1957) 96 CLR 261 at 269 per Dixon CJ applied
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate