Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Naing v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 344
MIGRATION – refugees – appeal from Refugee Review Tribunal decision to refuse to grant protection visa – whether s 424A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) is restricted to information specific to the applicant – whether Refugee Review Tribunal required to produce copy of transcript or tapes of hearing where it draws applicant's attention to evidence which might cast doubt on the applicant's evidence obtained in another application – whether the Refugee Review Tribunal misconceived its powers under s 415 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 415, 424A, 430, 476, 481 Migration Regulations 1994 reg 4.35(2)(b) Xu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 174 considered Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [1999] FCA 1681 considered Montes-Granados v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 60 considered Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Kandasamy [2000] FCA 67 referred to ZIN WAI NAING v
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 735 of 1999 HILL J 31 MARCH 2000 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 735 OF 1999
BETWEEN: ZIN WAI NAING
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND
MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: HILL J
DATE OF ORDER: 31 MARCH 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 735 OF 1999
BETWEEN: ZIN WAI NAING
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate